Sunday, August 05, 2007

Writing my papers

Finally am fishing up writing my papers, I have been focusing the following topics:

  • Trip Activities

  • HIV and AIDS epidemic in Africa

  • Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)and Solar Energy Substitution for Wood Fuel in Africa

  • Grass-roots NGOs Develop Trade –Africa
  • Community driven Development Delivery Strategies in Africa- East
  • Case study on economic reform in Tanzania , The Role of Business- Advocacy Coalitions

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Grass-roots NGOs Develop Trade -Africa

Non-governmental organizations can bring complementary skills, knowledge and commitment to trade development projects, particularly those helping poor communities.

Often, blocks to exporting are not directly related to trade matters. Poverty, HIV/AIDS, disabilities and cultural isolation are examples of issues that can stop people from running successful businesses. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) experienced in dealing with problems such as these can complement “traditional” trade development organizations to build export capacity.

In a few cases, they have led export development. For example, NGOs concerned about the effects of intensive farming promote trade in organic products.

  • Ownership: Do poor communities have a voice in the organization, in both planning and implementation?
  • Leadership: Is the organization committed to helping poor communities, and will it cooperate and communicate with other stakeholders?
  • Financial sustainability: What is the organization’s ability to generate sustained income? Are its accounting procedures accurate and transparent?
  • Capacity: What is the organization’s capacity to implement, monitor and evaluate activities?
  • Services: What services (including advocacy) can the organization give to poor communities or its members or its customers?

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Substitution for Wood Fuel in Africa


Inadequate access to modern energy sources is a common predicament of rural communities all over Africa. More than 75% of all households in Africa rely on traditional biomass - fuel wood and charcoal - as the primary energy source for domestic cooking and other productive activities. The heavy dependence of a large segment of the population on biomass fuels has been recognized as a major socio-economic development obstacle for the country. With increased awareness of the problems associated with burning fuel wood, African society is today looking for cleaner and more modern alternatives. One of these is Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG). A byproduct of crude oil refining, LPG is the generic name for compressed hydrocarbon gases, typically butane and propane. Because it is clean, safe and very efficient in generating heat, the use of LPG represents major progress and contributes to better quality of household life for many Africans.
Advantages of LPG•

Clean: LPG burns efficiently, without producing smoke and with low pollutant emissions. These inherently clean characteristics are especially important to reduce indoor air pollution and therefore, LPG is a major contribution to the better health of women and children.•

Portable: It is easily liquefied and stored in pressured containers. These properties make it portable, and hence, LPG can be easily transported in cylinders or tanks to endusers.

• Efficient: LPG is extremely efficient in generating heat, and therefore a major step up on the energy quality ladder.

• Multiple uses: LPG is an energy source capable of supporting multiple productive uses extending well beyond the household, such as developing micro-enterprises. Thus, it contributes to improving community life, health and sanitation by generating income at the community level.

From an environmental point of view, although it is derived from a fossil fuel, LPG emits much less carbon dioxide when burned than either coal or oil. As wood takes in as much carbon dioxide (CO2) to grow as it releases when burned, wood fuel is considered carbon dioxide neutral in terms of its greenhouse gas effect. However, traditional cooking stoves in Africa are extremely inefficient, to the point of losing 90 per cent of the heat to the surroundings. Wood fuel therefore produces substantively more greenhouse gas emissions per meal than LPG.

Monday, February 12, 2007

2007 Tanzania

More pictures of our current trip more to come, no good internet connections

===================================


Monday, February 05, 2007


Participatory Practices for Sustainable Development Training

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

More pictures about our last trip in Tanzania

I did add more pictures about our last trip in Tanzania, look on left below and click on “TANZANI06”

HIV and AIDS epidemic in Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa is more heavily affected by HIV and AIDS than any other region of the world. An estimated 24.5 million people were living with HIV at the end of 2005 and approximately 2.7 million new infections occurred during that year.1 In just the past year the epidemic has claimed the lives of an estimated 2 million people in this region. More than twelve million children have been orphaned by AIDS

The extent of the epidemic is only now becoming clear in many African countries, as increasing numbers of people with HIV are becoming ill. In the absence of massively expanded prevention, treatment and care efforts, it is expected that the AIDS death toll on the continent will continue to rise. This means that the epidemic's impact on these societies will be felt most strongly in the course of the next ten years and beyond. Its social and economic consequences are already widely felt, not only in the health sector but also in education, industry, agriculture, transport, human resources and the economy in general.

How are different countries in Africa affected?
HIV prevalence rates vary greatly between African countries. In Somalia and Senegal the prevalence is under 1% of the adult population, whereas in South Africa and Zambia around 15-20% of adults are infected.

In four southern African countries, the national adult HIV prevalence rate has risen higher than was thought possible and now exceeds 20%. These countries are Botswana (24.1%), Lesotho (23.2%), Swaziland (33.4%) and Zimbabwe (20.1%).
West Africa has been less affected by HIV, but the prevalence rates in some countries are creeping up. Prevalence is estimated to exceed 5% in Cameroon (5.4%), Côte d'Ivoire (7.1%) and Gabon (7.9%).

Until recently the national prevalence rate has remained relatively low in Nigeria, the most populous country in Sub-Saharan Africa. The rate has grown slowly from below 2% in 1993 to 3.9% in 2005. But some states in Nigeria are already experiencing HIV infection rates as high as those now found in Cameroon. Already around 2.9 million Nigerians are estimated to be living with HIV. Adult HIV prevalence in East Africa exceeds 6% in Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania.

Trends in the epidemic
Large variations exist between the patterns of the epidemic in individual countries. In some places, the HIV prevalence is still growing. In others it appears to have stabilised and in a few African nations - such as Kenya and Zimbabwe - declines appear to be underway, probably in part due to effective prevention campaigns. Others countries face a growing danger of explosive growth. The sharp rise in HIV prevalence among pregnant women in Cameroon (more than doubling to over 11% among those aged 20-24 between 1998 and 2000) shows how suddenly the epidemic can surge.

Overall, rates of new HIV infections in Sub-Saharan Africa appear to have peaked in the late 1990s, and HIV prevalence seems to be levelling off, albeit at an extremely high level. Stabilisation of HIV prevalence occurs when the rate of new infections is equalled by the death rate among the infected population. This means that a country with a stable but very high prevalence must be suffering a very high number of AIDS deaths each year. Although prevalence remains stable, the actual number of Africans living with HIV is rising due to general population growth.

What is the effect of these levels of infections?

Over and above the personal suffering that accompanies HIV infection, the epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa threatens to devastate whole communities, rolling back decades of development progress.

  • Sub-Saharan Africa faces a triple challenge of colossal proportions:
  • Providing health care, support and solidarity to a growing population of people with HIV-related illness, and providing them with treatment.
  • Reducing the annual toll of new infections by enabling individuals to protect themselves and others.
  • Coping with the cumulative impact of over 20 million AIDS deaths on orphans and other survivors, on communities, and on national development.

What is the impact of HIV & AIDS on Africa?
HIV & AIDS are having a widespread impact on many parts of African society. The points below describe some of the major effects of the epidemic. For a more detailed examination,

  • In many countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, AIDS is erasing decades of progress made in extending life expectancy. Millions of adults are dying young or in early middle age. Average life expectancy in Sub-Saharan Africa is now 47 years, when it could have been 62 without AIDS.
  • The effect of the epidemic on households can be very severe. Many families are losing their income earners. In other cases, income earners are forced to stay at home to care for relatives who are ill from AIDS. Many of those dying have surviving partners who are themselves infected and in need of care. They leave behind children grieving and struggling to survive without a parent's care. See our AIDS orphans page for more about the effect of the epidemic on children.
  • In all affected countries, the HIV/AIDS epidemic is putting strain on the health sector. As the epidemic develops, the demand for care for those living with HIV rises, as does the number of health workers affected.
  • Schools are heavily affected by HIV/AIDS. This a major concern, because schools can play a vital role in reducing the impact of the epidemic, through education and support.
  • HIV/AIDS dramatically affects labour, setting back economic activity and social progress. The vast majority of people living with HIV/AIDS in Africa are between the ages of 15 and 49 - in the prime of their working lives. Employers, schools, factories and hospitals have to train other staff to replace those at the workplace who become too ill to work.
  • Through its impacts on the labour force, households and enterprises, HIV/AIDS can act as a significant brake on economic growth and development. HIV/AIDS is already having a major affect on Africa's economic development, and in turn, this affects Africa's ability to cope with the epidemic.

HIV prevention in Africa

A continued rise in the number of Africans living with HIV is not inevitable. There is growing evidence that prevention efforts can be effective, and this includes initiatives in some of the most heavily affected countries.

In some countries there have been early and sustained prevention efforts. For example, effective prevention campaigns have been carried out in Senegal, which is still reflected in the relatively low adult prevalence rate of 0.9%. Also, the experience of Uganda shows that a widespread epidemic can be brought under control. HIV prevalence in Uganda fell from around 15% in the early 1990s to around 5% by 2001. This change is thought to be largely due to intensive HIV prevention campaigns.

More recently, similar declines have been seen in Kenya, Zimbabwe and urban areas of Zambia and Burkina Faso. However, the extremely severe epidemics in South Africa, Swaziland and Mozambique continue to grow.

Overall a massive expansion in prevention efforts is needed, and although there is no single or immediate tool to prevent new infections, the major components of a successful prevention programme are now known.

Condom use

Condoms play a key role in preventing HIV infection around the world. In Sub-Saharan Africa, most countries have seen an increase in condom use in recent years. In studies carried out between 2001 and 2005, eight out of eleven countries in Sub-Saharan Africa reported an increase in condom use.3
The distribution of condoms to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa has also increased: in 2004 the number of condoms provided to this region by donors was equivalent to 10 for every man,4 compared to 4.6 for every man in 2001.5 In most countries, though, many more condoms are still needed. For instance, in Uganda between 120 and 150 million condoms are required annually, but less than 40 million were provided in 2005.6
Relative to the enormity of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in Africa, providing condoms is cheap and cost effective. Even when condoms are available, though, there are still a number of social, cultural and practical factors that may prevent people from using them. In the context of stable partnerships where pregnancy is desired, or where it may be difficult for one partner to suddenly suggest condom use, this option may not be practical.
Provision of Voluntary Counselling & Testing (VCT)

The provision of voluntary HIV counselling and testing (VCT) is an important part of any national prevention program. It is widely recognised that individuals living with HIV who are aware of their status are less likely to transmit infection to others, and that through testing they can be directed to care and support that can help them to stay healthy. VCT also provides benefit for those who test negative, in that their behaviour may change as a result of the test. The provision of VCT has become easier, cheaper and more effective as a result of the introduction of rapid HIV testing, which allows individuals to be tested and find out the results on the same day. VCT could – and indeed needs to be – made more widely available in most Sub-Saharan African countries.

Mother-to-child transmission
Around 2 million children in Sub-Saharan Africa were living with HIV at the end of 2005. They represent more than 85% of all children living with HIV worldwide.7 The vast majority of these children will have become infected with HIV during pregnancy or through breastfeeding when they are babies, as a result of their mother being HIV-positive.

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV is not inevitable. Without interventions, there is a 20-45% chance that a HIV-positive mother will pass infection on to her child. If a woman is supplied with antiretroviral drugs, though, this risk can be reduced significantly. Before this measures can be taken the mother must be aware of her HIV-positive status, so testing also plays a vital role in the prevention of MTCT.
In many developed countries, these steps have helped to virtually eliminate MTCT. Yet Sub-Saharan Africa continues to be severely affected by the problem, due to a lack of drugs, services and information. The shortage of testing facilities in many areas is also contributing. Fewer than 6% of pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa were offered services to prevent MTCT in 2005.8 Given the scale of the MTCT crisis in Africa, it is remarkable that more is not being done (by both the international community and domestic governments) to prevent the rising numbers of children becoming infected.

HIV/AIDS related treatment and care in Africa

Antiretroviral drugs
Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) - which significantly delay the progression of HIV to AIDS and allow people living with HIV to live relatively normal, healthy lives – have been available in richer parts of the world since around 1996. Distributing these drugs requires money, a well-structured health system and a sufficient supply of healthcare workers. The majority of developing countries are lacking in these areas and have struggled to cope with the increasing numbers of people requiring treatment.

For most Africans living with HIV, ARVs are still not available - fewer than one in five of the millions of Africans in need of the treatment are receiving it. Many millions are not even receiving treatment for opportunistic infections, which affect individuals whose immune systems have been weakened by HIV infection. These facts reflect the world’s continuing failure, despite the progress of recent years, to mount a response that matches the scale and severity of the global HIV/AIDS epidemic.

Botswana pioneered the provision of ARVs in Africa, starting its national treatment program in January 2002. By September 2005 this program was providing treatment to around 54,378 people living with HIV. According to World Health Organization figures, 85% of people in need of treatment were receiving it at the end of the year, including those using the private sector. Thousands of lives have been saved as a result.

While most African countries have now started to distribute ARVs, progress in providing sufficient quantities of the drugs has been uneven and Botswana’s success has not been emulated elsewhere. Among the other countries that have made advances is Uganda, where more than half the people in need of ARVs are receiving them. In Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Malawi and Zambia, between 17% and 27% of people requiring antiretroviral drugs were receiving them in mid-2005. While South Africa is the richest nation in Sub-Saharan Africa and should have led the way in ARV distribution, its government was slow to act; so far, only 21% of those in need of treatment in South Africa are receiving it. In other countries, such as Ethiopia, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe, the figure is less than 10%.9

Nonetheless, the overall situation is slowly improving; the number of people receiving ARVs in Africa doubled in 2005 alone.10 International support has helped this increase, with numerous governments and international organizations encouraging progress. In 2003 the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated the ‘3 by 5’ program, which aimed to have three million people in developing countries on ARVs by the end of 2005. While this target was not reached, a number of African nations made substantial progress under the scheme. The latest international target, is aiming at universal access to treatment by 2010. Under this program it is hoped that considerable progress will be made in Africa.

There are still, however, a number of impediments to ARV provision. One major challenge is the fact that the majority of African countries have a poor healthcare infrastructure and a shortage of medical professionals. A considerable emphasis needs to placed not only on the availability of ARVs, but also the availability of professionals who are able to administer the drugs.

Another major challenge is ensuring that drugs are not only supplied to a lot of areas, but that sufficient quantities of drugs are supplied to those areas. This is critically important, because once an individual starts to take ARVs they have to take them for the rest of their life. If, for instance, their local hospital runs out of ARVs, the interruption that this causes in their treatment could result in them becoming resistant to the drugs. To improving treatment programs, African countries face the double challenge of getting new people to start treatment and maintaining the supply of treatment to those who are already receiving ARVs.

Other forms of treatment and care
Treatment and care for HIV/AIDS consists of a number of different elements apart from ARVs. These include voluntary counseling and testing, food and management of nutritional effects, follow-up counseling, protection from stigma and discrimination, treatment of other sexually transmitted infections, and the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections. All of these things can, and indeed should, be provided before ARVs are available. This does not exclude the provision of ARVs when they are available. Indeed, when ARVs do become available the provision of antiretroviral therapy should be easier and quicker to implement because many of the things apart from drugs that are needed for successful treatment are already in place.

What needs to be done to make a difference in Africa?

International support

One of the most important ways in which the situation in Africa can be improved is through increased funding. More money would help to improve both prevention campaigns and the provision of treatment and care for those living with HIV. Developed countries have increased funding for the fight against AIDS in Africa in recent years, perhaps most significantly through the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The Global Fund was started in 2001 to co-ordinate international funding and has since approved grants totaling US $3.3 billion to fight HIV and AIDS in Africa.11 Around 60% of the fund’s grants have been directed towards Africa and 60% has been put towards fighting AIDS.12 This funding is making a significant difference, but given the massive scale of the epidemic more money is still needed.
The US Government has shown a commitment to fighting AIDS in Africa through the President’s Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Started in 2003, PEPFAR provides money to fight AIDS in numerous countries, including 15 focus countries, most of which are African. In Fiscal Year 2005, PEPFAR allocated US $1.1 billion to these African focus countries.13 The US Government is also the largest contributor to the

~Global Fund~

Domestic commitment
More than money is needed if HIV prevention and treatment programs are to be scaled up in Africa. In order to implement such programs, a country’s health, education, communications and other infrastructures must be sufficiently developed. In some African countries these systems are already under strain and are at risk of collapsing as a result of AIDS. Money can also only be used efficiently if there are sufficient human resources available, but there is an acute shortage of trained personnel in many parts of Africa.
In many cases, African countries also need more commitment from their governments. There are promising signs that some governments are starting to respond and becoming more involved, and this commitment needs to be sustained if the impact of the epidemic is to be reduced.

Reducing stigma and discrimination
HIV-related stigma and discrimination remains an enormous barrier to the fight against AIDS. Fear of discrimination often prevents people from getting tested, seeking treatment and admitting their HIV status publicly. Since laws and policies alone cannot reverse the stigma that surrounds HIV infection, more and better AIDS education is needed in Africa to combat the ignorance that causes people to discriminate. The fear and prejudice that lies at the core of the HIV/AIDS discrimination needs to be tackled at both community and national levels.

Helping women and girls
In many parts of Africa, as elsewhere in the world, the AIDS epidemic is aggravated by social and economic inequalities between men and women. Women and girls commonly face discrimination in terms of access to education, employment, credit, health care, land and inheritance. These factors can all put women in a position where they are particularly vulnerable to HIV infection. In Sub-Saharan Africa, around 59% of those living with HIV are female.

In many African countries, sexual relationships are dominated by men, meaning that women cannot always practice safe sex even when they know the risks involved. Attempts are currently being made to develop a microbicide – a cream or gel that can be applied to the vagina, preventing HIV infection – which could be a significant breakthrough in protecting women against HIV. Women could apply such a microbicide without their partner even knowing. It is likely to be some time before a microbicide is ready for use, though, and even when it is, women will only use it if they have an awareness and understanding of HIV and AIDS. To promote this, a greater emphasis needs to be placed on educating women and girls and adapting education systems (which are currently male-dominated) to their needs.

The way forward
Tackling the HIV and AIDS crisis in Africa is a long-term task that requires sustained effort and planning - both within African countries themselves and amongst the international community. One of the most important elements of the fight against HIV and AIDS is the prevention of new infections. Prevention campaigns that have been successful within African countries need to be highlighted and repeated.

The other main challenge is providing treatment and care to those living with HIV in Africa, in particular ARVs, which can allow people living with HIV to live long and healthy lives. Many African countries have made significant progress in their treatment programs in recent years and it is likely that the next few years will see many more people receiving the drugs.

References
1. UNAIDS, '2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic'
2. Ibid.
3. UNAIDS, '2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic', Chapter 3: Progress in Countries
4. UNFPA website, Condom Programming
5. Shelton J.D. and Johnston B. (2001), 'Condom gap in Africa: evidence from donor agencies and key informants'
6. Kaisernetwork.org (September 2005), 'US has increased global condom distribution in recent years, targeting mostly high-risk groups'
7. UNAIDS, '2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic'
8. Ibid.
9. World Health Organisation (March 2006), Progress on Global Access to HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: A Report on 3 by 5 and beyond
10. UNAIDS, '2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic', Chapter 7: Treatment and care
11. The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (September 2005), Grants to Countries in Africa, Rounds 1-5 Funding
12. The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria website, FAQ
13. PEPFAR (February 2006), 'Action Today, A Foundation For Tomorrow: Second Annual Report to Congress on the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief'

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Western aid might be adding to Africa’s problems


Most western countries believe that the needs of the people of Africa are enormous and urgent, and at the same time they acknowledge that it is a moral outrage that they cannot meet them, even in the most basic ways.

There is need to change certain parameters if this aid is to be of any assistance to African countries. From the donor’s side there should be a clear objective of the particular aid and the objective should be precise.

All evidence on past performance suggest that aid flows are not what make the difference between successful developing countries and those which are not very successful. Aid can facilitate development and it has never done more than that.

At present Africa is beset by internal turmoil. It is divided and in debt. Its political leaders are in ideological crisis, not knowing in what direction to lead their people.

The Recent Past
After over a decade the poor are worse off than ever. School enrollment has dropped, real wages have fallen, deaths from preventable illnesses have risen. The number of poor in Sub-Saharan Africa increased from 184 million in 1985 to 216 million in 1990.

The collapse of the Soviet-style Communism obscures a deep crisis facing Western powers. Other forces are emerging to challenge them. One is fundamentalism. The West had a clear answer to Soviet communism, but has no answer to Islamic fundamentalism where the issues go beyond the development paradigm. Against Islamic fundamentalism, the West offers its own forms of Christian fundamentalism, but that only worsens the contradictions. Fundamentalism of all kinds is thus one new emerging force.
Another force is China, and other Asian powers. By the year 2020, China's economy is projected to be 140 per cent larger than that of the United States, and the economies of Japan, India and Indonesia will be among the world's five largest. Clearly, the balance of economic power is shifting from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

A third force is the increasing awareness in the West of its own shortcomings and vulnerabilities. This gives rise to a sense of insularity and insecurity. The Cold War eclipsed these for a time. Now they are fully exposed. Among the vulnerabilities are the increasing lack of public control over speculative financial flows, the phenomenon of "jobless growth", the rise of permanent unemployment and mounting burdens on welfare services. Compounding crises at economic and social levels are crises at ideological and cultural levels. The very values of "modernization" are under question. Challenges from, among others, the feminist and ecological movements are not just reformist challenges, but "systemic" ones, going to the very core of Western self-assurance.
Western agents want to retain their powers (over nuclear weapons, markets and resources) and sell ideas of democracy and human rights. But the West sees enemies everywhere, particularly the poor. Thus it wants to “ghetto-ise” itself in the citadels of its cities. It erects immigration barriers against hordes of people of color knocking at its gates. The result is increasing polarization between the white Christian, Judaic Western nations and the rest of the world. A kind of "global apartheid" has emerged.

The foregoing provides the context for assessing the role Western private aid agencies will play in Africa. There are exceptions, of course, but in general the private aid agencies are the advanced guard of the new era of Africa's re-colonization. They are the missionaries of the new era. Just as in the colonial era the missionaries neutralized the ideological defenses of colonized peoples and this prepared the ground for colonial occupation, so now the Western agencies play this role in the new era.
During the slave period there were in the West voices opposed to slavery. During the colonial period there were those who opposed colonialism. And today there are voices in the West who condemn the free-market system of development. But these are minority voices. The main thrust of Western civil society is to preserve their own lifestyle and civilization against the danger of encroachments from the South.

Some of the truths in the critique of "aid" are worth recalling here. Against the massive flow of resources leaving Africa, aid is only a trickle. Aid is directed primarily to serve Western, not African interests, as illustrated by the political aims behind US policy to put Israel and Egypt at the top of the list of its aid recipients. European aid has gone to the Lomé Convention countries mainly to sustain a neo-colonial linkage.
In this context what role have private aid agencies played? Essentially there have been four kinds of roles: diversionary, ideological, pacification and destructive of African institutions.

At a guess, between a quarter and a third of private aid agency money has gone into programmes such as population control and micro-enterprise support. These are diversionary in effect, and probably in intent. They draw attention away from the real causes of Africa's poverty. Neither population growth nor lack of enterprise are basic causes of Africa's poverty.

The ideological roles involve professing claims of universality for Western values of democracy, human rights, feminism and environmentalism. Private aid agencies promoting imported versions of these concepts have so thoroughly brainwashed a section of the middle class (living as they do, on lavish donor funds and international conferencing) that there are now signs of reaction against them. Slowly emerging is a return to African culture and traditions. These are seen as the place to begin. A return to the roots is also the place from which to challenge iniquitous and dangerous shortcomings of some of those traditions, as well as to avoid wholesale import of the West's ideological ragbag.

Pacification of people suffering from the effects of structural adjustment programs is another role. This absorbs between a quarter and a third of private agency funds. Besides being diversionary, they tend to legitimize structural adjustment measures and World Bank/IMF strategies. Of course, these fail. The problem is much larger than their petty donations can solve.

The fourth role is that of destroying African institutions - of education, traditional agriculture, traditional healing and health practices and governance.

In his book "Mozambique: Who Calls the Shots?”, Joe Hanlon has documented how private aid agencies systematically undermine the ability of the government to play its legitimate role of governing the country. Similar examples litter the African continent.
It is important to reiterate that there are exceptions to the general picture just painted. Nevertheless, the African grassroots and radical critique of the imperial project has been subverted by most private aid agencies. Faced by crises at home and the emerging new forces - notably Islam and China - the agencies' roles would be to help their governments and civil societies contain these new forces.

Now within the Western neoliberal tradition it is acceptable for a non-governmental organization to take a position ostensibly opposed to its government. Thus, a number of activist NGOs and private aid agencies helped the struggle against apartheid even as their governments supported it. But this is all part of a larger scheme of containing change within controllable parameters. In South Africa, it was the combined efforts of private aid and its governmental backers that managed to neutralize the more radical and revolutionary actors in that country's liberalization.

The language of "empowerment", "participatory development" and "decentralized cooperation" are all part of the ideological baggage of private aid agencies to manage change in Africa. African poverty will remain big on the agency agenda in the years to come. Poverty will become a commodity to nurture the missionary and humanist pretext for intervention in Africa. With it will come all the Western ideological ragbag of democracy, human rights, feminism, secularism, efficiency, empowerment, participatory development, green development, accountability and so on.

Only NGOs that can field programs rooted in African culture and civilization and are independent of donors who dictate their aims, will strengthen African civil society and move it in a progressive direction.